Measurement properties of instruments for post-extubation dysphagia in critically ill patients: A systematic review.

Authors

Lilly Koppelkamm, Martin Eicher, Peter Nydahl, Jan Matthias Kruse, Jan Kottner

Published in

Intensive & critical care nursing. Volume 98. Pages 104591. Oct 08, 2026. Epub Oct 08, 2026.

Abstract

Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common but often under-recognised complication in critically ill patients following invasive mechanical ventilation. Systematic assessment of PED in routine ICU practice is not common. This systematic review aimed to identify clinical instruments used to assess PED in critically ill adult patients and to evaluate their measurement properties.
This review was conducted in accordance with the COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of measurement instruments. A comprehensive evidence search was performed in multiple databases and other sources. Studies were included if they developed or applied standardised assessment instruments for the identification of PED in critically ill adults (≥18 years).
Of 2769 abstracts reviewed, 22 studies met criteria for inclusion. Sixteen different instruments for the assessment of PED were identified. These were categorised into water swallow tests, multi-consistency tests, and assessments without a swallowing evaluation. For nine instruments, measurement properties were reported, focusing on content validity, criterion validity and reliability, and demonstrated mostly good measurement properties. The Post-Extubation Dysphagia Screening Tool was the only evaluated across all three properties and showed sufficient measurement properties. The overall quality of evidence was mostly low to very low.
There are various clinical assessment instruments for PED in critically ill adults. Most instruments showed good criterion validity, indicating their potential for clinical use. However, other measurement properties are largely unknown, and the quality of evidence is generally low. Thus, it is currently unclear which tool is best suited for assessing PED. Further research investigating validity and reliability is needed to identify instruments suitable for routine ICU use.
Systematic detection of PED is important. Assessment instruments with good diagnostic performance should be used to improve ICU care.

PMID:
42849168
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.