Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Optimization of Circle-Seq improves transcription error profiling and transcriptome representation.

Created on 09 Oct 2026

Authors

Laura Deus Ramirez, Matthew Brandon Cooke, Jennifer Anne Halliday, Christophe Herman

Published in

RNA (New York, N.Y.). Oct 08, 2026. Epub Oct 08, 2026.

Abstract

Errors in transcription generate transient RNA variants that are amplified through translation, with potential consequences for cellular phenotypes and RNA-based therapeutics. Accurate detection of these rare events relies on high-fidelity sequencing approaches such as Circle-Seq, but technical artifacts introduced during RNA preparation can distort error profiles and frequencies. Here, we systematically evaluate the impact of bacterial RNA sample preparation on Circle-Seq outputs. We show that RNA extraction and ribosomal RNA depletion introduce artifactual oxidative damage signatures, particularly C>U and G>A substitutions, that inflate apparent transcription error rates. Optimized mRNA preparation conditions substantially reduce these artifacts. In addition, we identify an RNase III fragmentation bias caused by its preference for structured RNAs, resulting in uneven transcriptome coverage. Chaotropic monovalent ions mitigate this bias and improve coverage uniformity. Finally, our optimized protocol captured, with improved accuracy, the frequency and spectrum of transcription errors in absence of the transcription fidelity factor GreA. Together, these results define the technical limitations of Circle-Seq and provide practical solutions to improve the accuracy and interpretability of transcription error measurements in bacterial systems.

PMID:
42850029
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement