Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Proteomic dysregulation associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

Created on 09 Oct 2026

Authors

Sang-Won Han, Young Ho Park, Jung-Min Pyun, Paula J Bice, David A Bennett, Shahram Oveisgharan, Andrew J Saykin, SangYun Kim, Kwangsik Nho

Published in

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. Volume 22. Issue 10. Pages e71901.

Abstract

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is characterized by impaired vascular amyloid-β clearance, distinct from Alzheimer's disease (AD), underscoring the need to clarify its molecular basis for predicting therapy-related amyloid-related imaging abnormalities.
We analyzed post-mortem brain proteomics from Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROS/MAP) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to identify CAA-associated proteins and network modules, delineate their biological processes and cellular origins, and determine their diagnostic performance.
Proteomics analysis identified 30 proteins as associated with CAA severity, enriched in pathways distinct from AD pathology, with 11 replicated in ADNI. Two CAA-associated modules were enriched for microglial vesicle transport and astrocytic potassium-ion homeostasis. Pseudotime analysis demonstrated a molecular trajectory aligned with increasing CAA severity. Three proteins (RCSD1, FRZB, AKAP6) improved CAA classification beyond demographics and APOE ε4.
This integrative proteomics analysis identifies distinct, reproducible molecular signatures of CAA, revealing glia-mediated pathways and promising biomarkers for CAA detection and therapy-related risk assessment.

PMID:
42851145
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement