Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Plasma membrane proteomics reveals mechanism of low potassium tolerance in two contrasting maize genotypes.

Created on 09 Oct 2026

Authors

Ming Zhong, Shuisen Chen, Xudong Yang, Xiaojie Wang, Silu Li, Dian Jiao, Fei Zou, Jing Li, Yanye Ruan, Zhifu Guo, Pedro Garcia-Caparros

Published in

Frontiers in plant science. Volume 17. Pages 1957989. Epub Sep 24, 2026.

Abstract

Potassium (K) deficiency is a major constraint on plant growth and crop productivity. To elucidate the genotypic mechanisms underlying maize adaptation to K deficiency, we comprehensively compared the physiological responses and 8-plex iTRAQ (4 biological replicates) based plasma membrane (PM) proteomes of two maize genotypes with contrasting K efficiency. Under low-K conditions, the K-efficient genotype (K-ef) maintained greater growth and root vitality and exhibited significantly higher K concentration and accumulation than the K inefficient genotype (K-inef). Quantitative plasma membrane (PM) proteomic analysis revealed 52 differentially accumulated proteins (DAPs) in K-ef (29 upregulated and 23 downregulated) and 49 DAPs in K-inef (38 upregulated, and 11 downregulated). These DAPs were involved in transport, signal transduction, lipid metabolism, cellular structure, and redox/defense. Integrating the physiological and proteomic data revealed that K-ef may adopt an "energy-saving" strategy by prioritizing K+ transport, redox defense, and Ca2+ signaling, whereas K-inef falls into an energy-wasting strategy and indiscriminate stress response. Our study provides valuable insights into physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying low K stress in maize roots and providing a basis to further study K nutrition in other crop species.

PMID:
42851304
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement