Associations of Green Space and Air Pollution Mixture with Heterogeneous Biological Aging Patterns.

Authors

Guoqiang Ma, Jing Xu, Yishu Li, Yuefei Wu, Qian Li, Xuan Cao, Zitong Zhao, Jingyan Gao, Lijun Gao, Lina Yan, Xiaolin Zhang

Published in

Environmental health perspectives. Volume 134. Issue 6. Pages 659-671. Oct 06, 2026. Epub Sep 03, 2026.

Abstract

Evidence on associations between green space, air pollution mixture, and heterogeneous biological aging patterns remains limited. We investigated the opposing effects of green space and air pollution mixture on biological aging patterns using an accelerated longitudinal design based on repeated-measures data from 11,760 adults (aged 20-65 years) in a high-pollution Chinese city. Biological age acceleration (BAA) was derived via the Klemera-Doubal method. Group-based trajectory modeling identified three stable BAA profiles, labeled as "slow", "moderate", and "accelerated" aging, which were primarily distinguished by overall BAA magnitude rather than divergent slopes over age. Multinomial generalized linear mixed models and weighted quantile sum regression were applied to assess environmental associations. Higher green space (500 m normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)) was associated with lower odds of membership in the "accelerated aging" trajectory (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.95). Even under limited exposure contrast in this high-pollution setting, higher exposures to PM_2.5, PM₁₀, SO₂, and O₃ were associated with higher odds of membership in the accelerated aging trajectory. The air pollution mixture showed a consistent positive association (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.24), driven primarily by O₃ and PM₁₀. Mediation analysis revealed that 25.0% of the protective association of green space was mediated by reduced pollution exposure. These findings highlight green space as a vital resilience resource, supporting synergistic urban greening and pollution control strategies to promote healthy aging.

PMID:
42852352
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.