Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Increased mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration: A case report as an early clue of chronic severe hyponatremia.

Created on 10 Oct 2026

Authors

Jianping Chen, Shi Chen, Xinzheng Li, Baobing Chen, Jiyun Tian

Published in

Medicine. Volume 105. Issue 41. Pages e50997. Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) is a stable parameter, and its true elevation typically indicates hematological disorders. Although occasional reports suggest an association with electrolyte imbalances, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
An 81-year-old female was admitted with a 3-day history of altered mental status. Complete blood count revealed a markedly elevated MCHC (369 g/L), and peripheral blood smear showed reduced central pallor and mildly hyperchromic erythrocytes, suggestive of cellular dehydration.
Chronic severe hypotonic hyponatremia (serum sodium 102 mmol/L), initially alerted by a confirmed "true" MCHC elevation after systematically ruling out common analytical interferences.
Laboratory personnel issued an early warning for severe electrolyte imbalance prior to biochemical results. The patient subsequently received targeted sodium replacement therapy.
Following sodium replacement, the patient's serum sodium levels normalized (142 mmol/L), her mental status markedly improved, and her MCHC demonstrated a mirroring downward trend back to normal (337 g/L).
Laboratory physicians should consider true MCHC elevation, after excluding interferences, as a potential indicator of chronic hyponatremia. Proactive communication of this finding to clinicians can expedite diagnosis and treatment of critical electrolyte disorders.

PMID:
42854042
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement