Real-world effectiveness of pain pharmacotherapy for caesarean section in a low- and middle-income setting: A multicentre cross-sectional study in Ghana.

Authors

Sara Agyemang Antwi, Angela Owusu-Ansah, Patrick Nsor Agasiya, Kwesi Boadu Mensah, Charles Ansah

Published in

British journal of clinical pharmacology. Oct 09, 2026. Epub Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

Effective analgesia is needed after caesarean section to enhance maternal health-related quality. Unfortunately, little is known about the realities on the ground in low-and middle-income countries. This study investigated the prevalent perioperative pharmacotherapeutic practices in Ghanaian healthcare settings for women undergoing elective caesarean section and their association with acute postoperative pain.
A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among 515 women who underwent elective caesarean section at four teaching hospitals in Ghana. Demographic and clinical data were collected using structured questionnaires and medical record reviews. Acute postoperative pain was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) within the first 72 h after surgery. Data were analysed using R (Version 4.6.1). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Moderate to severe acute postoperative pain was reported by 60.0% (95% CI: 55.7%-64.1%) of participants despite widespread use of opioid-based analgesia. Multimodal analgesia was associated with significantly lower acute postoperative pain (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.22-0.48; p < 0.001). The use of midazolam was associated with a 62% reduction in the odds of acute post-surgery pain (OR = 0.38; 95% Bootstrap CI: 0.20-0.63; p < 0.001).
Multimodal analgesia was associated with superior postoperative pain control compared with opioid-based therapy alone; however, the persistently high prevalence of moderate to severe pain indicates substantial gaps in the implementation of contemporary pain management strategies during and following caesarean deliveries in Ghana.

PMID:
42855947
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.