Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Advances in the functional classification of intraocular lenses].

Created on 10 Oct 2026

Authors

Y Lu, X Chen, X J Zhu

Published in

[Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology. Volume 62. Issue 10. Pages 893-898. Oct 11, 2026.

Abstract

With the rapid development of intraocular lens (IOL) technology, the traditional classification system based on optical design has become unable to accurately present IOL properties and predict patients' real-world visual outcomes. In 2024, the Functional Vision Working Group (FVWG) of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) first proposed an evidence-based functional classification framework quantified by monocular best-corrected visual acuity defocus curves, depth of field and visual acuity increase from intermediate to near, which categorizes IOLs into six functional subtypes. Further refined by the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, the Asia Pacific Association of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons, and the Latin American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons, this framework was formally endorsed in a global multi-society consensus in 2026. Shifting from nominal classification by optical configuration to quantitative grading based on actual postoperative visual performance, the new system enables ophthalmologists to objectively evaluate IOL functional profiles and facilitates individualized preoperative IOL selection; it also provides valuable references for optimizing domestic IOL registration and volume-based procurement categorization in China. This article systematically reviews the background, methodology, evolutionary process, current domestic situation and clinical application of this classification system, aiming to help Chinese ophthalmologists fully understand and standardize the clinical application of this novel evidence-based classification method.

PMID:
42855789
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement