Urine dipstick test for assessing albumin-to-creatinine ratio: a pilot study and the potential impact on chronic kidney disease screening.

Authors

Farid Samaan, Cristiane Akemi Vicente, Amilton Mouro, Vitória Ângela Lorenzini Bellotto Bellini, Renata Santos, Letícia de Souza, Carlos Augusto Lima de Campos, José Arnaldo Shiomi Cruz, Ricardo Sesso, Gianna Mastroianni-Kirsztajn

Published in

BMC nephrology. Volume 27. Issue 1. Sep 03, 2026. Epub Sep 03, 2026.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare the sensitivity of two urine dipstick tests commercially available for detecting proteinuria and to project the potential impact of replacing one with the other for chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening in a large Brazilian health insurance company.
Urine spot tests were prospectively collected from a convenience sample of 410 adults with ≥ 1 CKD risk factor from a specialized outpatient clinic. Proteinuria was assessed by three methods: (1) total protein strip ("S10", the method currently used); (2) albumin-to-creatinine ratio strip ("S12", the index test), and (3) quantitative measurement of albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR, the standard reference test). The UACR measurements were categorized into three severity levels, in accordance with current guidelines: mild (< 30 mg/g), moderate (30-300 mg/g), and severe (> 300 mg/g). To project the potential impact of replacing S10 with S12, the one-year amount of ambulatory routine urinalysis tests was assessed.
Out of 410 study participants, 200 had quantitative UACR ≥ 30 mg/g. S12 showed greater sensitivity than S10 for detecting UACR ≥ 30 mg/g (95% [95%CI: 92-98%] vs. 64% [95%CI: 57-71%], p < 0.001), UACR 30-300 mg/g (56% [95%CI: 47-65%] vs. 36% [95%CI: 27-45%], p = 0.009), and UACR > 300 mg/g (95% [95%CI: 90-100%] vs. 79% [95%CI: 70-88%], p = 0.001). Considering the 777,096 routine urinalysis performed within the private health insurance and the prevalence of the main CKD risk factors in Brazilian population, replacing S10 with S12 would reduce the number of false negatives individuals with UACR ≥ 30 mg/g, UACR 30-300 mg/g, and UACR > 300 mg/g by 12,045 (86%), 6,217 (31%), and 1,243 (76%), respectively.
This diagnostic accuracy pilot study revealed that the albumin/creatinine urine dipstick had higher sensitivity than the total protein strip currently used by a private health insurance provider. The projection impact of replacing one with another suggests a significant reduction of undiagnosed cases. Further studies in representative screening populations are warranted to determine whether its implementation improves CKD detection in clinical practice.

PMID:
42855677
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.