Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Advantage of cerebellar intermittent theta-burst stimulation in Alzheimer's disease (ACT-AD): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

Created on 10 Oct 2026

Authors

Xin Zhang, Wen Li, Zhongqing Sun, Xiaomu Wang, Changgeng Song, Xiaorui Wang, Yinuo Niu, Dong Wei, Wei Zhang, Gejuan Zhang, Bei Zhang, Ling Wang, Zhirong Liu, Jingjing Zhao, Wen Jiang

Published in

Trials. Volume 27. Issue 1. Oct 09, 2026. Epub Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

The cerebellum plays a crucial role in cognitive processing and thus presents a promising therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease (AD). This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term, neuronavigated cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in patients with AD.
The ACT-AD trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study involving 100 participants with mild-to-moderate AD across 4 centers in China. Participants will be randomized to receive either cerebellar iTBS or sham stimulation for 4 weeks (daily sessions), followed by 8 weeks of weekly maintenance sessions. The primary outcome is the change in the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes include additional clinical scales. Exploratory outcomes include electroencephalogram (EEG), blood biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Statistical analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles using mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM).
The ACT-AD trial will assess the efficacy and safety of long-term, neuronavigated cerebellar iTBS in treating patients with mild-to-moderate AD.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06669182. Registered on 31 October 2024.

PMID:
42855713
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement