Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Model fit and parameter uncertainty in amortized variational inference based item response theory.

Created on 10 Oct 2026

Authors

K Veldkamp, R P P P Grasman, R Debelak, D Molenaar

Published in

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology. Oct 09, 2026. Epub Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

Amortized variational inference (AVI) has become a popular, computationally efficient alternative to marginal maximum likelihood estimation (MML) for estimating high-dimensional item response theory models on large datasets. However, currently the AVI framework lacks methods to assess model fit and determine parameter uncertainty. Therefore, it would be desirable to have the well established, classical goodness-of-fit based modelling assessment tools from item response theory available to assess models fit with AVI. However, AVI optimizes a lower-bound to the marginal likelihood, and the asymptotic properties that are required to use these tools are not guaranteed. In this paper, we use AVI estimates in a likelihood-based Fisher scoring procedure, ensuring asymptotic guarantees associated with MML. Large-sample theory for one-step estimators shows that when the initial estimator is sufficiently accurate (within an O p ( N ) neighbourhood of the true parameter), a single Fisher scoring update is sufficient to obtain a consistent, and asymptotically efficient estimator. We investigate empirically whether one scoring step suffices to restore the validity of classical goodness-of-fit measures and standard error estimation. Using simulation studies and an application to large-scale Narcissism Personality Inventory data, we show that the proposed AVI-initialized one-step Fisher scoring approach yields fit statistics and uncertainty estimates that are on par with MML while retaining the computational advantage of AVI.

PMID:
42855882
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement