Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Incisional Hernia After Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Created on 11 Oct 2026

Authors

Arthur Peyrottes, Olivier Oberlin, Michael Baboudjian, Charles Dariane, Frederic Panthier, Pierre Mongiat-Artus, François Desgrandchamps, Guillaume Ploussard, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte

Published in

European urology open science. Volume 93. Pages 42-47. Epub Sep 28, 2026.

Abstract

Incisional hernia (IH) is an under-recognized complication after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP).
We performed a systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to evaluate the proportion, risk factors, and surgical determinants of IH after MIRP.
Sixteen studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included, encompassing 56 661 patients. Most were retrospective cohorts, with heterogeneous definitions and diagnostic methods. The reported proportion of IH ranged from 0.04% to 31%, with a median time to diagnosis of 14 mo. Repair was required in up to 80% of cases, and emergency repair in up to 15%. Two comparative studies directly evaluating specimen extraction site consistently reported lower proportions of IH with transverse suprapubic (Pfannenstiel) extraction than with periumbilical extraction, while three registry-based studies similarly reported lower proportions following open compared with MIRP. Evidence regarding the influence of fascial incision orientation on reported IH occurrence was mixed, whereas no clear difference was reported between midline and off-midline extraction sites. Reported factors associated with IH included advanced age, obesity, larger prostate volume, postoperative parietal abscess, and prior abdominal surgery. Limitations include the heterogeneity in the studies included.
These findings highlight IH as a clinically meaningful complication of MIRP. Reported IH occurrence differed by specimen extraction site in the available observational studies, but the evidence remains limited by heterogeneous definitions, follow-up, and risk of bias. Preventive strategies, including the site of specimen extraction, warrant further prospective evaluation.

PMID:
42859558
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement