Patient-ventilator asynchronies beyond the waveform.

Authors

Candelaria de Haro, Eduardo Mireles-Cabodevila, Gerard Castells-Tortosa, Leonardo Sarlabous, Lluís Blanch

Published in

Current opinion in critical care. Oct 12, 2026. Epub Oct 12, 2026.

Abstract

Patient-ventilator asynchrony is commonly treated as a technical mismatch requiring correction, although asynchronous breaths are not uniformly harmful and apparent synchrony may conceal injurious effort. This review summarizes evidence from the past 18 months that redefines asynchrony through inspiratory effort, the transition to assisted breathing, and continuous waveform monitoring.
Potential harm depends on effort magnitude and timing, breath stacking, ventilatory mode, lung and diaphragm vulnerability, dyspnea, and cumulative exposure. Double triggering, reverse triggering, and ineffective efforts may indicate injury, overassistance, or recovery depending on context. During transition, work shifts from ventilator to patient, exposing patients to both excessive and insufficient effort. Continuous analysis can identify burden, clustering, and physiological trajectories missed by intermittent inspection. Artificial-intelligence models increasingly estimate effort and dynamic driving pressure, but heterogeneous definitions, limited external validation, artifacts, and uncertain actionability constrain implementation.
Management should move beyond eliminating individual events toward minimizing time outside individualized ranges of acceptable effort and assistance. Monitoring should integrate waveforms with effort, lung stress, diaphragm loading, dyspnea, ventilator settings, and temporal context. Artificial intelligence should support bedside reassessment rather than autonomous adjustment. Multicenter validation and physiology-guided trials must establish whether this approach improves patient-centered outcomes.

PMID:
42859859
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.