Historical redlining and breast cancer screening in a regional spatial analysis.

Authors

Derrick Asante, Atikur Rahman, Isuru Ratnayake, Sam Pepper, Ananda Jayawardhana, Leah Lambart, Susan Beckman, Hope Krebill, Ronald Chen, Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam

Published in

JNCI cancer spectrum. Oct 10, 2026. Epub Oct 10, 2026.

Abstract

Redlining, introduced in 1933 by the Homeowners' Loan Corporation, created enduring structural inequities in housing, health care access, and neighborhood investment. These historical patterns may contribute to persistent disparities in breast cancer screening. This study examines how historical redlining, alongside contemporary socioeconomic factors, shapes screening disparities across the University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC) catchment area.
We conducted a census tract-level spatial analysis across 123 counties (Kansas and western Missouri) by linking CDC PLACES breast cancer screening data with historical redlining maps. Explanatory variables included rurality, mammography facility availability, income inequality, gender pay gap, and uninsured rates. Logistic regression assessed overall associations, while geographically weighted binomial logistic regression evaluated spatial heterogeneity.
Screening rates ranged from 56.9% to 84.5% across census tracts. Redlining was associated with lower screening odds in unadjusted models but was attenuated after accounting for socioeconomic and geographic factors. Rurality and income inequality were consistently associated with lower screening, whereas greater mammography facility availability was associated with higher screening rates. Spatial analyses revealed meaningful geographic variation, with localized negative associations of redlining and persistent, spatially varying effects of socioeconomic factors.
Breast cancer screening disparities in this region reflect the combined influence of historical structural inequities and current socioeconomic conditions. Expanding access to mammography and implementing spatially targeted, equity-focused interventions may improve screening uptake and reduce disparities in underserved communities.

PMID:
42860041
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.