Supportive Outpatient-Provider Communication-A Scoping Review About Expectations, Experiences, and Actual Behaviours Regarding Healthcare Visits.

Authors

Sari Knaapi-Junnila, Tuula-Riitta Välikoski, Pekka Isotalus

Published in

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. Volume 32. Issue 7. Pages e70626.

Abstract

Twenty-first century healthcare has struggled with chronic illnesses while policies have emphasised patient centeredness and support. The importance of ambulatory visits and self-management necessitate understanding about supportive outpatient-provider communication.
This systematic scoping review focused on supportive communication as actual behaviours, and outpatients' expectations and experiences concerning visits. CINAHL, CIOS ComAbstracts, CMMC, and MEDLINE were searched for answering questions about (1) the extent, range, and nature of studies and (2) existing knowledge in 21st century. The framework presented by Arksey and O'Malley and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews were utilised.
After screening 310 hits, twelve studies were included. Studies were usually quantitative surveys about experiences, cancer, and specialised physicians in US. Existing data suggest that patients share common ground regarding supportive communication preferences while also differences exist. Access to care and it's continuity include in support desires. Provider's and patient's qualities affect provided support. Education and health status, inter alia, affect experiences. Mismatch between expected and experienced support, and experience of non-constructive support include in findings.
This review contributed by summarising the existing studies and findings, and by identifying research gaps. Actual evidence about supporting outpatient-provider communication is still thin and unilateral. Thus, gaps are manifold and we must be cautious with interpretations. Interdisciplinary collaboration is required to enhance our understanding. The lack of studies concerns especially (a) qualitative studies about diverse cultures, patients, and providers in primary care; (b) video materials about actual behaviours; (c) expectations (as values) together with experiences; (d) studies about expectations as probabilities. Importantly, organisations/systems should be perceived as integral (f)actors of supportive outpatient-provider communication. Existing knowledge about supportive, person-centred, and patient-provider communication is valuable until we know more about supportive outpatient-provider communication.

PMID:
42860021
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.