Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Joint count transformation models with covariate-dependent correlations.

Created on 12 Oct 2026

Authors

Lukas Graz, Luisa Barbanti, Roland Brandl, Torsten Hothorn

Published in

Ecology. Volume 107. Issue 10. Pages e70522.

Abstract

Joint species distribution models are essential for understanding how ecological covariates shape species communities. However, most existing approaches are limited by rigid parametric distributions for count data and the inability to model how interspecific associations change with those covariates. We introduce joint count transformation models, a novel framework designed to overcome these limitations. Our approach combines distribution-free marginal count transformation models for multiple species with a covariate-dependent latent Gaussian copula to model interspecific correlations, interpretable as Spearman's rank correlation on the observed count scale. All model parameters are estimated efficiently via joint maximum likelihood estimation, implemented in the R package tram. We apply this framework to model the joint abundance of three fish-eating bird species, using seasonality as the primary covariate. Our model successfully captured the complex, species-specific seasonal abundance patterns, including periods of high zero counts and seasonal shifts in variance. Furthermore, the model revealed strong, seasonally varying correlations between the species. These findings are consistent with an empirical approach and similar to those from the computationally expensive parametric Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling of Species Communities (HMSC) framework. Consistency, accuracy, and feasibility of our approach are demonstrated in a simulation study for up to 10 species.

PMID:
42862040
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement