Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A Confidence Index for eCHORD Orientation Mapping.

Created on 12 Oct 2026

Authors

Gabriel L'Hôte, Thierry Douillard, Joël Lachambre, Cyril Langlois

Published in

Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada. Volume 32. Issue 6. Oct 12, 2026.

Abstract

Orientation mapping techniques such as electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and automated crystal orientation mapping technique (ACOM-TEM) rely on dedicated quality metrics to assess the reliability of crystallographic indexing at each pixel. The eCHORD technique (electron CHanneling ORientation Determination), which recovers crystalline orientations in a standard scanning electron microscope by matching experimental backscattered electrons intensity profiles against a database of theoretical profiles, currently lacks such a robust confidence indicator. This work introduces a confidence index for eCHORD orientation mapping based on the windowed normalized cross-correlation index (wNCC) between experimental and theoretical profiles evaluated over sliding angular windows. Unlike the Euclidean distance used in the standard indexing step, the wNCC is sensitive to local profile discrepancies and provides a per-pixel reliability estimate directly analogous to the confidence index in EBSD or the reliability index in ACOM-TEM. The index was validated on three materials-an aluminum alloy, a copper microelectronic pad, and an α-titanium sample-and across several acquisition and indexing conditions. It successfully identifies unreliable pixels at grain boundaries, surface defects, and within poorly indexed grains, and constitutes an effective confidence metric within the eCHORD framework.

PMID:
42862157
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement