Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

QT Interval Prolongation in Athletes With Negative Genetic Testing and Complete Normalization After Detraining.

Created on 12 Oct 2026

Authors

Simone Ungaro, Francesca Graziano, Amedeo De Antoni, Matteo Pizzolato, Alessandro Zorzi

Published in

JACC. Case reports. Pages 110650. Oct 12, 2026. Epub Oct 12, 2026.

Abstract

QT interval prolongation is traditionally associated with congenital or acquired long QT syndrome; however, its interpretation in athletes remains challenging because of possible exercise-induced electrophysiological adaptations.
We report a case series of 4 competitive athletes referred to our Sports Cardiology clinic after incidental detection of marked QT interval prolongation during preparticipation screening for sports eligibility. All individuals were asymptomatic, took no QT interval-prolonging drugs, had normal electrolyte levels, and had negative family screening and genetic testing. Following a detraining period of 3-6 months, repeat electrocardiograms showed consistent normalization of both QT interval and corrected QT intervals in all cases. The magnitude of the corrected QT interval reduction was substantial and observed intraindividually, independently of significant changes in heart rate.
These findings support the concept that, in some athletes, QT interval prolongation may represent a dynamic and reversible phenotype related to training load, termed "exercise-induced" long QT interval. Recognition of this pattern may help avoid misdiagnosis of congenital long QT syndrome and inappropriate restriction from competitive sports, although its long-term arrhythmic risk remains unclear.

PMID:
42862128
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement