Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multidomain Auditory Differences in Tinnitus With a Clinically Normal Audiogram: Accounting for Extended High-Frequency Hearing.

Created on 13 Oct 2026

Authors

Halime Sümeyra Sevmez, Eser Sendesen, Meral Didem Türkyilmaz

Published in

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR. Pages 1-15. Oct 12, 2026. Epub Oct 12, 2026.

Abstract

Tinnitus can occur in individuals with clinically normal audiograms, suggesting that conventional threshold-based measures may not capture subtle auditory-system differences. This study aimed to characterize peripheral and subcortical auditory function in tinnitus using a multidomain, exploratory multivariate framework.
Twenty individuals with tinnitus and clinically normal conventional audiograms (0.125-8 kHz) and 25 age-matched controls underwent a multidomain auditory assessment, including auditory brainstem response (ABR), otoacoustic emission, medial olivocochlear suppression, middle ear muscle reflex, temporal fine structure, and extended high-frequency (EHF) audiometry. Group differences were evaluated using exploratory unadjusted analyses, followed by EHF-adjusted analysis of covariance and exploratory principal component analysis (PCA).
Initial exploratory comparisons showed that the tinnitus group had elevated EHF thresholds, reduced ABR Wave I amplitude, differences in cochlear-output and efferent reflex measures, and poorer temporal-processing performance. However, these differences were no longer significant after adjustment for EHF thresholds, suggesting that the overall pattern was largely related to basal cochlear variability. PCA identified three components explaining 72% of cumulative variance, reflecting afferent auditory contribution and basal cochlear output, efferent reflex regulation, and cochlear-temporal coupling.
Individuals with tinnitus and clinically normal conventional audiograms exhibited subtle differences across multiple auditory domains rather than a single isolated deficit. Several of these differences were attenuated after adjustment for EHF, indicating that EHF hearing should be considered when interpreting auditory findings in this population. These findings support the inclusion of EHF assessment as part of the audiological evaluation of individuals with tinnitus.

PMID:
42862891
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement