Authors
Kazuki Yanagida, Akio Horiguchi, Daisuke Kubota, Takuya Touge, Takehiro Hanazawa, Takaaki Yokoyama, Yuhei Segawa, Daisuke Watanabe, Kenichiro Ojima, Masayuki Shinchi, Keiichi Ito
Published in
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. Volume 117. Issue 3. Pages 79-82.
Abstract
A 67-year-old man presented to another clinic with a weak urinary stream. Urethral dilation was attempted, but insertion was difficult. Urethroscopy revealed a penile urethral stricture with a false passage. He later developed urinary retention and, after suprapubic cystostomy, was referred to us. Retrograde urethrography demonstrated an approximately 4-cm penile stricture with contrast extravasation into the corpora cavernosa, and contrast-enhanced MRI revealed a corpus cavernosum abscess measuring approximately 33 mm in maximal diameter. Because simultaneous abscess drainage, fistula repair, and urethroplasty were considered impractical, we performed perineal urethrostomy. Three months later, MRI showed a residual abscess cavity; however, in the absence of pain or signs of infection, we deferred further procedures such as fistula repair or abscess drainage and continued observation. Urethral dilation is not indicated for penile strictures, and indiscriminate use can cause serious complications, including corpus cavernosum abscess.
PMID:
42864028
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 4
- Comments 0