Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multivessel Disease and STEMI: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Created on 13 Oct 2026

Authors

Daniel O'Callaghan, Himanshu Rai, Daniele Giacoppo, J J Coughlan, Róisín Colleran, Rory Durand, Mark S Spence, Mark Kennedy, Gavin J Blake, Colm G Hanratty, Adnan Kastrati, Robert A Byrne

Published in

JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. Volume 19. Issue 19. Pages 2589-2600. Oct 12, 2026.

Abstract

For patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease, complete revascularization is recommended. The timing of nonculprit lesion intervention, either immediately during the index procedure or staged at a later time, has been investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
This study sought to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing immediate vs staged complete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease presenting with STEMI.
We conducted a frequentist, pairwise meta-analysis. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: multicenter RCTs comparing immediate vs staged nonculprit revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI; exclusive use of second-generation (or newer) drug-eluting stents; a follow-up duration of ≥1 year; and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and unplanned revascularization. Summary estimates were computed using random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting based on trial-level HRs and 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251124207).
After a systematic search, 4 randomized trials comprising 2,651 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of all-cause death at 1-year was higher with immediate complete revascularization (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.02-2.21; P = 0.04; prediction interval [PI]: 0.80-2.81; I2 = 0%; t2 = 0). Immediate complete revascularization reduced the risk of recurrent MI when using the protocol specified definitions which included procedural MI (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36-0.94; P = 0.02; PI: 0.22-1.54; I2 = 0%; t2 = 0.034) but did not reduce risk of spontaneous MI (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.55-1.48; P = 0.90; PI: 0.41-2.00; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.00). The risk of cardiac death and unplanned revascularization was comparable between the treatment groups.
In STEMI and multivessel disease, immediate complete revascularization may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause death at 1-year when compared with staged complete revascularization. The treatment effect on mortality should be interpreted cautiously because of the relatively low number of deaths across the 4 trials and the statistical fragility of the findings. The findings from this analysis do not support an immediate complete revascularization strategy in these patients.

PMID:
42863871
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement