Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Methodological exploration of embedding qualitative and mixed methods research in acupuncture pilot trials from the perspective of complex interventions].

Created on 13 Oct 2026

Authors

Changhe Yu, Shasha Liang, Hao Wang, Hui Shao, Yanan Sun

Published in

Zhongguo zhen jiu = Chinese acupuncture & moxibustion. Volume 46. Issue 10. Pages 1588-1596. Oct 12, 2026. Epub Aug 11, 2026.

Abstract

Large randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture often face challenges of high heterogeneity in outcomes. The underlying reason is that acupuncture, as a complex intervention, is simplified to a single intervention, while pilot trials fail to effectively optimize trial designs. Based on the framework of complex interventions, this article proposes a paradigm shift for acupuncture pilot trials, transforming them from simple quantitative feasibility assessments into comprehensive platforms for systematically improving the maturity of population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) elements. This article systematically reviews the necessity of embedding qualitative research or mixed methods research within this paradigm and elucidates their key roles in identifying core issues, optimizing interventions, refining procedures, exploring mechanisms, and enhancing the interpretability of results. Furthermore, mixed methods design strategies and specific implementation pathways tailored to different objectives are proposed. Finally, the challenges of this paradigm in terms of cognitive acceptance, methodological integration, and resource requirements, as well as corresponding strategies, are critically analyzed. This article aims to provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for establishing a more rigorous and highly interpretable methodological framework for acupuncture clinical trials.

PMID:
42864281
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement