Dosimetric Comparison of Five Radiotherapy Techniques in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors

Yanqiu Zhang, A'meng Han, Sen Yang, Jianxin Zhao, Xiumei Li

Published in

The breast journal. Volume 2026. Issue 1. Pages e6666976.

Abstract

This study aims to compare and evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of five radiotherapy techniques in left-sided breast cancer patients following breast-conserving surgery. The five radiotherapy techniques include three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (ff-IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), hybrid 3D-CRT with IMRT (CRT + IMRT), and hybrid 3D-CRT with VMAT (CRT + VMAT).
Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer who received postlumpectomy radiotherapy at the Department of Radiation Oncology, First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, between June 1, 2020, and June 1, 2021, were randomly enrolled in this study. For each patient, five distinct treatment plans were designed using the five aforementioned techniques (3D-CRT, ff-IMRT, VMAT, CRT + IMRT, and CRT + VMAT) based on identical computed tomography (CT) imaging datasets. Dosimetric parameters for the tumor target volume, organs at risk (OARs), and normal tissues (defined as body minus planning target volume [PTV], termed B-P) were analyzed and compared using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and isodose distributions.
The CRT + VMAT technique demonstrated superior PTV dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity compared to 3D-CRT, ff-IMRT, VMAT, and CRT + IMRT (p < 0.05). In contrast, the VMAT technique achieved significantly lower V₃₀ (%) values for bilateral lungs and ipsilateral lung than 3D-CRT, ff-IMRT, CRT + IMRT, and CRT + VMAT (p < 0.05). The CRT + IMRT technique reduced V₅ (%) values for bilateral lungs, ipsilateral lung, and heart compared to 3D-CRT, ff-IMRT, VMAT, and CRT + VMAT (p < 0.05). Finally, 3D-CRT required the fewest monitor units (MUs) and shortest treatment time among all techniques (p < 0.05).
Clinicians may tailor radiotherapy plans to individual patients based on the distinct dosimetric profiles of each technique. For patients requiring optimal PTV dose distribution, the CRT + VMAT technique is suggest. For enhanced cardiopulmonary protection (e.g., reduced lung/heart doses), ff-IMRT or CRT + IMRT may be prioritized. Additionally, 3D-CRT should be the first choice for patients needing rapid fractionated treatment due to its efficiency in minimizing MUs and treatment time.

PMID:
42865147
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.