Authors
Maciej Behnke, Wadim Krzyżaniak, Szymon Jęśko Białek, Patryk Maciejewski, Audrey-Ann Journault, Sylvia Kreibig, Jeremy P Jamieson, James J Gross
Published in
Psychophysiology. Volume 63. Issue 10. Pages e70419.
Abstract
A baseline is necessary to define biological reactivity in psychophysiological research. However, the conceptualization and implementation of baseline measurements are often underdescribed and weakly justified. This poses a problem because poor baseline decisions have the potential to introduce noise, reduce comparability across studies, and bias interpretations of data. In this article, we focus on laboratory studies using cardiovascular measures in affective psychophysiology. Motivated by substantial variation and limited reporting of baseline procedures, we examined within-baseline stabilization in two studies. Study 1 analyzed 1593 baseline sessions from 1310 participants in the POPANE and CEPAV datasets. Study 2 assessed generalizability using data from 2395 participants collected in a U.S. laboratory. Findings suggest that although different cardiovascular indices may stabilize differently during a 5-min baseline, this procedure is a reasonable, pragmatic choice. More broadly, findings highlight the need for stronger justification, standardization, and reporting of baseline procedures in psychophysiological research.
PMID:
42864900
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 8
- Comments 0