Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Prognostic impact of surgical-side pulmonary artery diameter in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing lobectomy.

Created on 13 Oct 2026

Authors

Shunta Tsuchida, Joji Samejima, Masashi Wakabayashi, Makoto Tada, Tomohiro Miyoshi, Kenta Tane, Keiju Aokage

Published in

Journal of thoracic disease. Volume 18. Issue 9. Pages 1023. Sep 30, 2026. Epub Aug 28, 2026.

Abstract

A surgical-side pulmonary artery diameter (ssPAD) ≥23 mm has been linked to postoperative complications after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its prognostic significance remains unclear. This study evaluated whether ssPAD ≥23 mm serves as an independent prognostic factor and a useful indicator for preoperative risk assessment.
We retrospectively analyzed 438 patients who underwent lobectomy for NSCLC between 2016 and 2017. Patients were classified by ssPAD: ≥23 mm (n=116) and <23 mm (n=322). Survival outcomes and clinicopathological variables were compared. The prognostic performance of ssPAD was assessed using C-statistics against main pulmonary artery diameter (MPAD) ≥28 mm and pulmonary artery-to-aorta (PA/A) ratio >1.
The ssPAD ≥23 mm group showed lower 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS; 61% vs. 71%, P=0.047) and overall survival (OS; 69% vs. 81%, P=0.001). Lung cancer-specific mortality (24% vs. 13%, P=0.03) and non-cancer mortality (15% vs. 7.1%, P=0.042) were higher, while adjuvant therapy was less frequent due to dyspnea. In multivariable analysis, ssPAD ≥23 mm remained an independent predictor of OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-2.79, P=0.004].
Preoperative ssPAD ≥23 mm may be an independent prognostic marker after lobectomy for NSCLC and a simple computed tomography (CT)-based tool for risk stratification.

PMID:
42865797
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement