Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The Expanding Role of Carbohydrate Antigen 125 in Heart Failure: From Tumour Marker to a Cornerstone of Heart Failure Management. An Updated Narrative Review.

Created on 13 Oct 2026

Authors

Agustín Fernández-Cisnal, Anna Mollar, Gema Miñana, Rafael de la Espriella, Enrique Santas, Miguel Lorenzo, César Romero Menor, Julio Núñez

Published in

Cardiac failure review. Volume 12. Pages e31. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

Congestion is central to heart failure (HF) but remains difficult to quantify. Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), also known as mucin 16, released by mesothelial cells, captures two pathways relevant to HF: fluid overload and inflammation. This narrative review summarises biological mechanisms and clinical applications. Across acute and chronic settings, CA125 tracks systemic and right-sided congestion, complements natriuretic peptides and shows lower dependence on renal function. Higher levels identify patients at risk for death and readmission; in ambulatory HF with reduced ejection fraction it predicts events, while in HF with preserved ejection fraction its signal is strongest in congestion-dominant phenotypes. Serial testing mirrors decongestion and clinical course; CA125-guided care has reduced rehospitalisations and improved renal function measures in selected populations. Advantages, wide availability, standardisation and low cost, support use in practice. Key gaps include phenotype-specific threshold, sampling interval and integration into actionable algorithms. Overall, CA125 has moved from tumour marker to practical tool that refines congestion assessment, improves risk stratification and informs individualised therapy in contemporary HF care.

PMID:
42865763
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement