Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Plasma biomarker strategies to reduce diagnostic uncertainty in p-tau217-based assessment of CSF amyloid positivity in secondary-care patients with MCI.

Created on 13 Oct 2026

Authors

María Pascual-Lucas, Leticia Sarasa, Noelia Fandos, Jorge Loscos, Judith Romero, Adrián Sánchez, Jose Terencio, Isabel Ortega-Madueño, María Cruz Cárdenas, Fernando Cava-Valenciano, María José Gil-Moreno, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, José Antonio Allué

Published in

Frontiers in aging neuroscience. Volume 18. Pages 1918304. Epub Sep 28, 2026.

Abstract

Plasma p-tau217 accurately reflects amyloid pathology, but dual-cutoff strategies leave a non-negligible grey zone requiring confirmatory testing. We evaluated whether integrating plasma Aβ measurements could reduce diagnostic uncertainty in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Plasma p-tau217 was measured using the Lumipulse platform, and plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 were quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (ABtest-MS) in 186 secondary-care MCI patients. CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 defined amyloid status. Logistic regression models were compared, and dual-cutoff strategies targeting 95% predictive values were applied.
p-tau217 was the strongest individual biomarker. Models incorporating plasma Aβ measures improved AUC, model fit, and reduced the grey zone from 27.4% with p-tau217 alone to 12.3%. A sequential two-step strategy restricted additional Aβ testing to p-tau217-indeterminate cases and reduced the final grey zone to 13.4%.
Plasma Aβ measurements complement p-tau217 by reducing the indeterminate results, with the potential to improve diagnostic efficiency and streamline diagnostic workflows.

PMID:
42865723
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement