From static digital articulation to the dynamic (4D) digital virtual patient: an umbrella review of digital occlusal analysis and jaw-motion tracking.

Authors

Marco Farronato, Lucia Giannini, Davide Farronato, Giada di Iasio, Cinzia Maspero

Published in

Journal of dentistry. Pages 107107. Oct 13, 2026. Epub Oct 13, 2026.

Abstract

To synthesize review-level evidence on static digital articulation, computerized occlusal analysis, jaw-motion tracking and dynamic (4D) digital virtual patient integration, while distinguishing the specific claims each technology can support.
Review characteristics, technical accuracy, repeatability, validity, clinical outcomes, primary-study overlap and review-level risk of bias.
PubMed/MEDLINE, Europe PMC, Crossref, OpenAlex, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos were searched or checked through 10 July 2026. Reference-list and citation searching supplemented database retrieval.
Thirty-four reports were included: 29 systematic reviews, four scoping reviews and one structured evidence map, representing 663 review-study occurrences. Of the 29 ROBIS-rated reviews, two were at low risk, 15 at unclear risk and 12 at high risk of bias. Static digital articulation was conditionally accurate in dentate, stable-contact and short-span settings. Contact location was more defensible than intensity, area or absolute force. Jaw tracking and digital virtual patient integration were technically feasible, but heterogeneous reference frames, small studies and sparse clinical outcomes constrained inference.
Digital occlusion is not a single validated construct. Maxillomandibular relationship transfer, contact location, relative force/timing, movement trajectory and integrated clinical decisions require distinct validation. Technical accuracy, precision, repeatability and feasibility should not be interpreted as evidence of clinical effectiveness or patient benefit. Current systems are best used as calibrated, clinician-verified adjuncts.
Static digital articulation can support selected restorative workflows, whereas complex spans, edentulous arches, force interpretation, dynamic simulation and diagnostic use require independent verification. Reliable upstream registration does not establish downstream patient benefit.

PMID:
42869410
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.