Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Supplementary Use of an Intraoral Scanner in an Older Patient With Microstomia After Maxillary Cancer Resection.

Created on 14 Oct 2026

Authors

Pedro Molinero-Mourelle, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Patrick Zimmermann, Martin Schimmel

Published in

Gerodontology. Oct 13, 2026. Epub Oct 13, 2026.

Abstract

To describe how digital technologies can compensate for potential errors during impression procedures in an older patient following maxillary cancer resection.
Maxillary defects after oncologic resection in older adults cause functional and aesthetic impairment. Rehabilitation must consider anatomical alterations, systemic conditions, and patient-related constraints that may limit surgical or implant-based options. Intraoral scanning may serve as a supplementary tool to improve the accuracy of intraoral records in such cases.
A 72-year-old female patient with adenoid-cystic carcinoma of the maxilla underwent left hemimaxillectomy and microvascular reconstruction. She presented with impaired mastication and microstomia. Following clinical assessment, a maxillary removable partial denture was planned and fabricated using a combined conventional-digital workflow adapted to anatomical and functional limitations.
The prosthesis provided satisfactory retention, stability, and function, improving mastication and aesthetics. No biological or mechanical complications were observed during follow-up.
Intraoral scanning can serve as a useful supplementary tool to verify and correct discrepancies in conventional impressions, particularly in older patients with anatomical and functional limitations following maxillary cancer resection.

PMID:
42870524
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement