Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Burned habitats facilitate predation and lead to long-term reductions in prey success.

Created on 14 Oct 2026

Authors

Kirby L Mills, Martin Leclerc, Mark A Ditmer, David C Stoner, Zachary L Steel, Joseph O Sexton, Panshi Wang, Kent R Hersey, Cody A Schroeder, Alyson M Andreasen, Kristin Engebretsen, Julie K Young, Brock McMillan, Randy Larsen, Derek B Hall, Brandon Holton, David Choate, Neil H Carter

Published in

The Journal of animal ecology. Oct 14, 2026. Epub Oct 14, 2026.

Abstract

Intensifying wildfire regimes under global change are expected to shift species interactions through changes in habitat structure and composition, vegetation productivity, and sensory cues. Yet there is little evidence of how burn-induced changes in habitat composition and structure modify predator-prey relationships. We investigated how wildfires influence relationships between mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and cougars (Puma concolor) in the US Intermountain West using high-resolution telemetry data, kill site locations, and annual measures of mule deer fawn production. Burned habitats experienced a wide range of fire severities, and most fires occurred between 5 and 20 years prior to animal data collection. We found that cougars were located closer to deer and their kill sites were nearly 2× more likely to occur in burned areas compared to unburned sites, suggesting that burns confer advantages to predators. In addition, fawn production declined by up to 14% at sites with histories of more recent, higher severity burns. Our findings suggest that increasingly frequent, severe burns are diminishing herbivore reproductive success, potentially due to increasing predation risks that outweigh improved foraging opportunities for prey. Ultimately, we reveal a possible pathway through which changing fire regimes could threaten herbivore prey populations in Western US ecosystems.

PMID:
42870585
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement