Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Childhood maltreatment and appearance-related social media consciousness: the moderating role of gender and social media use time.

Created on 14 Oct 2026

Authors

Weiying Gao, Wanran Huang

Published in

Frontiers in psychology. Volume 17. Pages 1865576. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

Appearance-related social media consciousness (ASMC) has emerged as an important construct for understanding appearance-related vulnerability in social media contexts, yet its developmental antecedents remain underexplored. This study examined the associations between retrospectively reported childhood maltreatment and ASMC and tested whether these associations varied by gender and social media use time.
Participants were 405 Chinese university students recruited from two universities. They completed measures of ASMC, childhood maltreatment, social media use time, and demographic characteristics. Path analysis, multi-group analysis, and moderation analysis were conducted, with body mass index (BMI) controlled.
Emotional abuse (β = 0.12, p = 0.040) and sexual abuse (β = 0.12, p = 0.014) were positively associated with ASMC, whereas physical neglect was negatively associated with ASMC (β = -0.13, p = 0.047). The overall pattern of maltreatment-ASMC associations differed by gender, Δχ 2(5) = 11.50, p = 0.042. Direct Wald tests indicated that only the sexual abuse-ASMC association differed significantly between males and females, χ 2(1) = 9.61, p = 0.002.
These findings suggest that retrospectively reported childhood maltreatment is associated with ASMC, with different maltreatment subtypes showing distinct patterns of association. The sexual abuse-ASMC association differed significantly by gender, whereas no significant moderating effect of social media use time was found.

PMID:
42871416
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement