Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Immune biomarkers of response and resistance to ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Created on 15 Oct 2026

Authors

Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Christopher R Cabanski, Alexandra Drakaki, Danny N Khalil, Bilal A Siddiqui, Sreyashi Basu, Kwame Okrah, Diane M Da Silva, Shikha Gautam, Farah A Alayli, Mike Schachter, Justin Fairchild, Wai Chin Foo, Silvia Boffo, Jamie Arnott, Ute Dugan, Sumit K Subudhi, Padmanee Sharma

Published in

Science advances. Volume 12. Issue 42. Pages eaee8730. Oct 16, 2026. Epub Oct 14, 2026.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint therapies have shown limited efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The AMADEUS prostate expansion cohort (NCT03651271) evaluated the efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of escalating ipilimumab doses combined with nivolumab. Patients received ipilimumab 1 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) + nivolumab 360 mg (I1+N360), ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + nivolumab 1 mg/kg (I3+N1), or ipilimumab 5 mg/kg + nivolumab 1 mg/kg (I5+N1). Coprimary endpoints were 6-month disease control rate (DCR) and changes in tumoral CD8 percentage. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. DCRs were 33% (4 of 12) for I1+N360, 20% (1 of 5) for I3+N1, and 20% (3 of 15) for I5+N1. Across cohorts, tumoral CD8 percentage increased by a median of 5.0%. Although higher ipilimumab doses were tolerable, I1+N360 achieved similar disease control and immune activation with a more favorable safety profile. Early disease progression was associated with increased expression of a TREM2-associated myeloid gene signature, which was also significantly enriched in two independent prostate cancer datasets.

PMID:
42873849
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 66
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement