Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association of eGFR Discrepancy With Subsequent Frailty in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

Created on 15 Oct 2026

Authors

Jingru Bi, Yilin Pan, Wenkai Guo, Pengcheng Ji, Yuansheng Xie

Published in

Journal of nephrology. Oct 14, 2026. Epub Oct 14, 2026.

Abstract

Creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate estimates are influenced by different non-GFR determinants. Their difference (eGFRcys-eGFRcr) may therefore provide information beyond either marker alone. We examined its longitudinal association with frailty and exploratory indirect associations through grip strength.
We analyzed 15,309 observations from 11,174 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study participants aged 45 years or older across 2011-2013 and 2015-2018. Standardized eGFR discrepancy was the exposure; follow-up outcomes were the 32-item Frailty Index and frailty (Frailty Index ≥0.25). Linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations accounted for repeated observations. Model 3 was primary; eGFRcys adjustment was a conditional sensitivity analysis.
Median age was 60.0 years, and 53.4% of participants were female. A 1-SD higher discrepancy was associated with a lower follow-up Frailty Index (β, -0.503; 95% CI, -0.678 to -0.328; P < 0.001) and lower odds of frailty (OR, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.804-0.900; P < 0.001). Associations persisted after eGFRcys adjustment. Exploratory three-wave analyses showed indirect associations through grip strength, not causal mediation.
Higher eGFR discrepancy was longitudinally associated with lower subsequent frailty burden. Further studies are needed to clarify its clinical interpretation and underlying determinants.

PMID:
42874069
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement