Failure to rescue and predictors of severe morbidity after esophagectomy: a single-center experience from a high-volume Italian referral center.

Authors

Simona Grimaldi, Pietro M Lombardi, Monica Gualtierotti, Paolo DE Martini, Vincenzo Nicastro, Michele Mazzola, Giovanni Ferrari

Published in

Minerva surgery. Volume 81. Issue 4. Pages 228-235.

Abstract

Esophagectomy for cancer remains a high-risk procedure. Failure to rescue (FTR) - death following a major complication - is a key metric for surgical quality. This study evaluates FTR incidence and predictors of severe morbidity in a high-volume center with standardized clinical pathways.
We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing curative- intent esophagectomy at a high-volume Italian referral center (2017-2024). Failure to Rescue (FTR) - defined as 90-day mortality after Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa complications - was tracked as the primary benchmark outcome. To investigate the clinical drivers behind the FTR pathway, multivariable logistic regression was specifically utilized to identify independent predictors of its mandatory clinical substrate, namely severe postoperative morbidity.
Out of 102 included patients, 39 (38.2%) experienced major complications. The overall 90-day mortality was 2.9% (N.=3), resulting in an FTR rate of 7.7%. Pulmonary complications (45.1%) and anastomotic leakage (10.8%) were the most frequent adverse events. On multivariable analysis, preoperative malnutrition (MUST score >2; OR 2.82, 95% CI: 1.03-7.73, P=0.044) and high comorbidity burden (aCCI ≥5; OR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.17-9.60, P=0.025) were independent predictors of severe postoperative morbidity.
Our FTR rate of 7.7% aligns with international high-volume benchmarks. Preoperative nutritional status and comorbidity burden are critical for risk stratification. Enhancing outcomes requires a dual strategy: proactive prehabilitation for high-risk patients and a robust, multidisciplinary rescue system to manage unavoidable complications.

PMID:
42876339
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.