Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Evidence on Glutathione and Boosters for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Created on 15 Oct 2026

Authors

Min Jung Geum, Jinyoung Jeon, JinYoung Moon, Hyun Woo Lee, Soyun Kim, Yun Mi Yu, Young-Mi Ah

Published in

Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. Volume 139. Issue 5. Pages e70319.

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) adversely affects treatment efficacy and quality of life. Despite studies on glutathione (GSH) or GSH boosters' antioxidative effects for prevention, optimal management remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to consolidate and critically appraise the current evidence and to compare the efficacy of GSH and GSH boosters for the prevention of CIPN. The MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched through March 2025. Twenty-five RCTs involving 1625 patients were included. No intervention significantly reduced all-grade CIPN compared with placebo. N-acetylcysteine (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, 95% credible intervals [CrI] 0.05-0.63), GSH (OR 0.34, 95% CrI 0.13-0.79) and vitamin E (OR 0.33, 95% CrI 0.11-0.91) were associated with a reduced incidence of grade 3/4 CIPN compared with placebo. N-acetylcysteine ranked highest for both all-grade and grade 3/4 CIPN prevention. These findings remained consistent in sensitivity analyses excluding patients with pre-existing neuropathy but were not retained in analyses restricted to double-blind studies. Overall, N-acetylcysteine, GSH, and vitamin E were associated with potential reductions in severe CIPN, with N-acetylcysteine consistently ranking highest, although these associations should be regarded as preliminary. Further rigorously conducted and adequately powered trials are warranted to confirm these findings and evaluate agents demonstrating potential benefits.

PMID:
42876024
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement