Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Morphofunctional indices and ontogeny of long bones of the limbs in the frogs.

Created on 15 Oct 2026

Authors

Mónica C Soliz, María J Tulli

Published in

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007). Oct 14, 2026. Epub Oct 14, 2026.

Abstract

Anuran limbs offer a valuable model for exploring how selective pressures, developmental constraints, and morphological evolution interact. While previous research has largely focused on total limb length, little is known about ontogenetic changes in the proportions of individual limb bones. This study introduces a novel approach using morphofunctional indices to investigate the functional roles of frog limbs, linking morphology to habitat use and locomotion. We present morphological and ontogenetic data from anurans in northwestern Argentina, emphasizing functionally relevant bone indices. Measurements were taken of 18 long bone dimensions (humerus, radioulna, femur, tibiofibula, tarsals) across 79 specimens at metamorphic, juvenile, and adult stages. Eight morphofunctional indices were calculated, including five newly proposed ones. Indices such as radioulna robustness, groove position, femur and tibiofibula robustness, and tarsal fusion differed among ecological and locomotor groups. Terrestrial hopper-walkers such as Rhinella arenarum and Rhinella spinulosa have more robust hind limb bones and shorter, less-fused tarsals than jumpers like Boana riojana. These traits may be functionally associated with short-distance jumping and shock absorption. We also observed a slenderness-robustness gradient across species, reflecting locomotor strategies. Stylopodial elements show negative allometry, while zeugopodial elements exhibit positive allometry, indicating increased precision and flexibility in limb function throughout development.

PMID:
42876139
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement