Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Explainable machine-learning model for postoperative lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis after gynecologic cancer surgery.

Created on 15 Oct 2026

Authors

Yanhong Zhang, Congcong Shi, Deyan Yang, Xiaona Ji, Yingli Chu

Published in

Frontiers in oncology. Volume 16. Pages 1813354. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

Postoperative lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common and potentially fatal complication after radical surgery for gynecologic malignancies, yet population-specific risk tools remain limited.
We retrospectively analyzed 500 consecutive patients who underwent radical surgery for cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer (January 2022-January 2025). The cohort was randomly divided into a training set (n=351, 70%) and a validation set (n=149, 30%) at a 7:3 ratio. Independent predictors were identified using logistic regression, and 10 machine-learning algorithms were trained and compared. Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated, and the optimal model was interpreted using SHAP.
DVT occurred in 116 patients (23.2%). Five variables were independently associated with DVT: age, Caprini score, lymphocyte count, preoperative D-dimer, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).Across candidate models, CatBoost achieved the optimal overall performance on the validation set, yielding an AUC of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.738-0.881), with sensitivity of 0.824 (95% CI: 0.700-1.000) and specificity of 0.730 (95% CI: 0.515-0.876), and SHAP analysis ranked the predictors by mean absolute SHAP value in the following order: lymphocyte count, Caprini score, age, preoperative D-dimer, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
An interpretable CatBoost-based model enables individualized postoperative DVT risk stratification after gynecologic cancer surgery and may support targeted, evidence-based thromboprophylaxis and perioperative nursing management.

PMID:
42876541
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement