Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Partitioning photoperiod- and chilling-driven cold hardiness in a Vitis riparia × V. vinifera F1 population.

Created on 15 Oct 2026

Authors

Hava Delavar, Ozkan Kaya, Summaira Riaz, Harlene Hatterman-Valenti

Published in

Frontiers in plant science. Volume 17. Pages 1916819. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

Grapevine cold hardiness governs cultivar distribution and winter survival, and is a key constraint on viticulture in cold regions. We evaluated bud cold hardiness in a Vitis riparia × Vitis vinifera F1 population by differential thermal analysis across three environments (a California vineyard, an NDSU field, and an NDSU greenhouse), sampled nine times through the 2023-2024 dormant season. Mean low-temperature exotherms (LTEs) differed significantly among sampling times, and hierarchical clustering separated the genotypes into five hardiness classes defined by mean LTE, from very hardy (≤ -21.4 °C) to very susceptible (≥ -13.4 °C). Field vines reached a midwinter maximum of -22.7 °C, whereas greenhouse vines were most susceptible (-14.6 °C), and nine genotypes were hardier than the tender parent. Genotype accounted for only 7% of the phenotypic variance, giving a low single-observation heritability (H²i = 0.07) but a moderate entry-mean heritability (H²c = 0.49), which are distinct statistics reported separately. The seasonal trajectory was well described by logistic and response-surface models (R² = 0.99) and, on an accumulated-chilling axis, by a Weibull model (half-hardening at 184 chilling degree-days). A state-space model estimated the chilling contribution at ≈6.7 °C and identified three genotypes (536-078, 539-127, 536-142) that attained most of their hardiness under the short-day, moderate-cooling greenhouse regime without sub-zero exposure; because that regime combined shortening photoperiod with a 4 °C decline, these are described as short-day/low-temperature responsive rather than photoperiod-responsive. Mean hardiness and plasticity were uncorrelated, providing no evidence of a hardiness-stability trade-off. The December field and greenhouse samplings exposed the greatest among-genotype variance and are the most informative conditions for future QTL mapping; the nine genotypes hardier than the tender parent, and a hardy, stable subset, are identified as parents for cold-hardiness introgression.

PMID:
42876794
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement