Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Bryce Demopoulos, Leah Seifu, Slavenka Sedlar, Jacqueline Ehrlich

Published in

Pediatric blood & cancer. Pages e70679. Oct 15, 2026. Epub Oct 15, 2026.

Abstract

Although prior reports suggest sickle cell disease (SCD) as a risk factor for lead poisoning, this association remains understudied. This paper assesses the relationship between SCD and elevated blood lead levels (BLLs) in New York City children.
We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of children born in NYC from 2004 to 2016 and tested for BLLs from 2004 to 2022. Children with SCD were matched 1:2 to children without SCD based on maternal race and country of birth. Firth penalized-likelihood logistic regression estimated associations between SCD and BLLs ≥3.5, ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 µg/dL, adjusting for Medicaid status, housing age, and maternal race. Additional analyses evaluated effect modification by age and SCD genotype.
The cohort included 1463 children with SCD and 2982 without SCD. SCD was associated with lower odds of BLLs ≥3.5 µg/dL (odds ratio [OR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.99), no difference at ≥5 µg/dL (OR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.66-1.10), and higher odds at ≥10 µg/dL (OR 1.82; 95% CI: 1.06-3.13), with a similar estimate at ≥15 µg/dL (OR 2.23; 95% CI: 0.98-5.07). The SCD-by-age interaction was significant at ≥10 µg/dL (OR 4.47; 95% CI: 1.41-15.50), and children with HbSS had significantly higher odds of BLLs ≥10 µg/dL and BLLs ≥15 µg/dL than children without SCD (OR 2.25 and 2.98, respectively).
Children with SCD have increased odds of elevated BLLs at higher thresholds, especially those aged ≥3 years and those with HbSS. Targeted rescreening of these children warrants consideration.

PMID:
42877978
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement