Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparison of Patiromer and Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate for Chronic Hyperkalemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Mashael Alzahrani, Douaa Sindi, Saeed M G Al-Ghamdi, Naser Omran Odah, Rana Alghamdi, Ahmed Alrefaei

Published in

Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 12. Issue 1. Pages 842-853. Epub Aug 05, 2026.

Abstract

Chronic hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) often limits the use of vital renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi).
This prospective cohort study compared the efficacy and safety of patiromer (n = 40) versus sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) (n = 40) for chronic hyperkalemia management in 80 adult CKD patients.
Over a 6-month follow-up, both agents effectively reduced serum potassium from similar baseline levels (patiromer: 5.73 ± 0.59 mmol/L; SPS: 5.62 ± 0.50 mmol/L) with no significant difference in efficacy (p > 0.05). However, key differences in the clinical impact on RAASi therapy emerged, alongside numerical but statistically nonsignificant differences in tolerability. Patients receiving patiromer had a significantly lower rate of RAASi therapy discontinuation compared to the SPS group (5.2% vs. 36.3%; p = 0.033), enabling continuation of guideline-directed medical therapy. A trend towards poorer compliance was noted in the SPS group (22.5% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.060). An exploratory analysis revealed that patiromer initiation significantly increased tacrolimus levels in post-kidney transplant recipients (p = 0.003), necessitating dose adjustments.
While both agents showed comparable potassium-lowering efficacy, patiromer's numerical advantages in tolerability and significant benefit in maintaining RAASi therapy position it as a valuable therapeutic option in this high-risk population.

PMID:
42877862
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement