Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Matched analysis of the LACE+ score for post-operative outcomes in patients with intradural spinal tumors.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Emily Xu, Jennifer Cirvello, Kristen H Park, Sumasri Kotha, Joshua L Golubovsky, Mackenzie Castellanos, Scott D McClintock, Anish Butala, Gabrielle W Peters, Alvand Hassankhani, Hayley M Knollman, James Schuster, Colbey W Freeman, Neil R Malhotra

Published in

British journal of neurosurgery. Pages 1-8. Oct 15, 2026. Epub Oct 15, 2026.

Abstract

The management of intradural spinal tumors can be complex and associated with high resource utilization. The LACE+ index is a validated tool developed to predict post-operative readmission and mortality. This study evaluated the utility of LACE+ in patients undergoing surgery for intradural spinal tumors.
Data on patients undergoing spinal oncology surgery for intradural tumors (n = 275) with LACE+ score was collected. Coarsened exact matching was used to control for confounding variables and assess the predictive value of LACE+. Patients with a LACE+ score in the top quartile (≥ 58, n = 18) were compared to matched patients in the bottom quartile (≤23, n = 18). A secondary analysis compared the top (> 44, n = 58) and bottom (≤ 44, n = 58) halves. Outcomes included 30- and 90-day ED visits, readmissions, reoperations, non-home discharges, and mortality.
After matching, patients in the top LACE+ quartile had greater odds of non-home discharge (OR 5.80, p = 0.02) and 90-day readmission (OR 5.52, p = 0.04). In the secondary analysis, patients in the top half had greater odds of non-home discharge (OR 2.5, p = 0.04).
Higher LACE+ scores were associated with non-home discharge and 90-day readmission after intradural spinal tumor surgery. Application of this tool may guide risk stratification and perioperative management of patients.

PMID:
42878242
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement