Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Beyond inert: how carbon supports tune the oxygen evolution activity of polyoxometalate-based single-atom catalysts.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Mengke Wang, Guang-Jie Xia

Published in

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. Oct 15, 2026. Epub Oct 15, 2026.

Abstract

Phosphomolybdic acid (PMA)-based single-atom catalysts (SACs) are promising for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), but the role of their ubiquitous carbon support has rarely been investigated. Using density functional theory (DFT), we systematically investigated the OER on TM1/PMA (TM = Fe, Co, Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt; PMA = [PMo12O40]3-) with no support, a pristine carbon support, a hydroxyl (-OH)-functionalized support, and a carboxyl (-COOH)-functionalized support. We found that the mere presence of carbon support strongly modulates catalytic activity, an effect that far outweighs that of its subsequent functionalization. Bader charge analysis reveals significant electron donation from the carbon support to the TM1/PMA unit, markedly altering intermediate adsorption free energies, which in turn either improves or worsens OER performance by shifting the metals along the descriptor axis and slightly lowering the volcano apex. For example, the Ni1/PMA@C achieves a low overpotential of 0.37 V, markedly lower than 0.70 V for bare Ni1/PMA. This support-induced modulation carries a critical methodological implication: for single-metal-on-anion SAC systems such as PMA-based catalysts, the carbon support must be explicitly included in theoretical models to capture its essential charge transfer with SAC. The carbon support is far from an inert scaffold but is a key factor in designing high-efficiency PMA-based single-atom OER catalysts.

PMID:
42878237
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement