Authors
Tülin Öğreden, Yusuf Akdağ
Published in
Case reports in ophthalmology. Volume 17. Issue 1. Pages 1088-1095. Epub Jul 27, 2026.
Abstract
In the presence of bilateral optic disc elevation with supportive clinical findings, papilledema should be considered the primary diagnosis. Particularly in bilateral presentations, optic disc drusen must be carefully evaluated in the differential diagnosis. The coexistence of these entities may complicate clinical assessment and follow-up. This case report presents a patient initially managed with a presumptive diagnosis of papilledema who was subsequently found to have concomitant drusen during follow-up.
A 13-year-old patient presented with complaints of decreased vision and headache. Visual acuity was 0.4 in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye. Fundus examination revealed bilateral optic disc elevation, more prominent in the right eye. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with increased intracranial pressure. During follow-up, the expected regression in optic disc elevation was not observed. Increased intracranial pressure was confirmed by a lumbar puncture with an opening pressure of 42 cm H2O, while optic disc drusen was confirmed by ultrasonography and fundus autofluorescence imaging.
Optic disc drusen may mimic papilledema but can also coexist with true papilledema. In cases with an atypical clinical course, multimodal imaging techniques contribute significantly to the differential diagnosis.
PMID:
42877875
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 9
- Comments 0