Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Identification and functional validation of GREM2 and PIK3C2G as senescence-associated genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Weifeng Zhao, Shuyan Zhao, Chaojie Wang, Guanzhong Dong, Facai Cui, Mengyao Wang, Zhirui Lin

Published in

Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects. Pages 131014. Oct 15, 2026. Epub Oct 15, 2026.

Abstract

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive malignancy with dismal clinical outcomes, and how cellular senescence modulates ESCC biology remains poorly understood. Here, we integrated transcriptomic profiles from the TCGA-ESCC cohort with a curated panel of cellular senescence-related genes to identify and functionally validate senescence-associated regulators in ESCC. Univariate Cox regression and consensus clustering stratified ESCC patients into two molecular subtypes with divergent survival. Through differential expression analysis, random forest prioritization, and independent validation in the GSE20347 cohort, we identified GREM2 and PIK3C2G as lead candidate genes. Both were consistently downregulated in ESCC tumors and cell lines, and low expression predicted poorer overall survival. Gain- and loss-of-function experiments demonstrated that GREM2 and PIK3C2G drive p16/p21-dependent cellular senescence, trigger the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), and restrict proliferation in esophageal epithelial cells. Immune correlation analyses linked both genes to immune cell infiltration, chemokine signaling, and MHC molecule expression in the tumor microenvironment. These findings establish GREM2 and PIK3C2G as senescence-associated tumor suppressors in ESCC, offering candidate biomarkers and a rationale for exploring senescence-directed therapies in this disease.

PMID:
42880610
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement