Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

In vivo acquired resistance to tamoxifen is associated with irreversible loss of IGF1R, upregulation of insulin receptor and enhanced sensitivity to insulin.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Katelyn J Hoff, Priya Periakaruppan, Courtney S Baar, Valeria C Torres Irizarry, Deepali Sachdev

Published in

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. Jun 11, 2026. Epub Jun 11, 2026.

Abstract

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) like tamoxifen are used to treat hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancers. Several models of in vitro acquired resistance to tamoxifen using HR+ breast cancer cell lines have been developed. There are few models of resistance to tamoxifen that are generated in vivo . Here, we generated a model of in vivo resistance to tamoxifen. We show that in vivo tamoxifen resistance is associated with loss of IGF1R. This loss is irreversible as it persists even when tamoxifen is removed. In vivo tamoxifen resistance is also associated with upregulation of insulin receptor, specifically the A isoform of IR (IR-A). These resistant cells show enhanced insulin sensitivity compared to the parental endocrine sensitive or in vitro acquired tamoxifen resistant cells. Finally, we demonstrate that in vivo resistance to tamoxifen results in enhanced proliferation in response to insulin. These studies establish that some mechanisms of in vivo resistance to tamoxifen differ from those observed for in vitro acquired resistance and increased dependence on insulin signaling drives endocrine resistance in HR+ breast cancer. Taken together, these studies present that targeting IR-A in combination with newer targets of tamoxifen resistance could be tested in endocrine resistant breast cancer.

PMID:
42885369
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement