Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Urinary DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies a Biologically Distinct Subgroup of Low-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma with High-Grade-Associated Features.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Marc Andreu-Inglés, Alina-Iuliana Onoiu, Marc Grifoll-Escoda, Anna Hernández-Aguilera, Josep Gumà-Padró, Francesc Riu, Karla Peña, Jordi Camps, David Parada

Published in

International journal of molecular sciences. Volume 27. Issue 19. Oct 08, 2026. Epub Oct 08, 2026.

Abstract

Bladder cancer surveillance remains challenging because conventional methods do not fully capture the biological heterogeneity within histologically low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC). We evaluated whether urinary DNA methylation profiling using Bladder EpiCheck™ can identify clinically relevant LGUC subgroups in a retrospective single-center cohort of 134 patients with paired histopathology, urine cytology, and methylation results. Methylation positivity increased across negative histopathology, LGUC, and high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) (18.4%, 51.4%, and 91.5%, respectively). Within LGUC, 19 of 37 tumors (51.4%) were methylation-positive. Their EpiScores overlapped those of HGUC, whereas methylation-negative LGUCs exhibited scores similar to negative histopathology. Gaussian mixture modeling independently supported a bimodal distribution. Methylation-positive LGUCs demonstrated a higher Ki67 labeling index, more frequent MTAP loss (33.3% vs. 11.8%), and more recurrences, including recurrence as HGUC, than methylation-negative LGUCs. Conventional nuclear morphometry did not distinguish between the two LGUC subgroups. These exploratory findings suggest that urinary DNA methylation may identify a biologically distinct subset of histologically low-grade tumors with selected high-grade-associated features. Prospective external validation is required before methylation status can inform surveillance or treatment decisions.

PMID:
42884175
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 50
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement