Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The Glass Escalator and the Glass Cage-Between Opportunity and Constraint in Male Nurses' Professional Status: A Scoping Review.

Created on 16 Oct 2026

Authors

Junwei Zhu, Qiuchen Liu, Xiao Sang, Enshe Jiang, Jiangong Ma

Published in

Journal of advanced nursing. Oct 15, 2026. Epub Oct 15, 2026.

Abstract

To systematically map factors associated with male nurses' professional status using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) and describe reported outcomes and evidence gaps across multiple ecological levels.
Scoping review.
We searched five databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science) through December 2025, supplemented by searches of ProQuest, Google Scholar, and manual ancestry searching.
We extracted and mapped data from 97 quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies using a four-level SEM framework (individual, interpersonal, organizational and sociocultural levels).
The studies in this review showed that factors related to male nurses' professional status mapped across ecological levels, suggesting that opportunities and gender constraints coexist at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and sociocultural levels. Reported aspects included career motivation, economic factors, patient preferences for nurse gender, perceptions of intimate care, task distribution, working relationships, and societal stereotypes. These patterns differed across healthcare practices, cultural backgrounds, and career stage. Reported outcomes for professional status included professional identity, burnout, clinical practice adaptations, career development and turnover intention. Evidence primarily focused on male nursing students and male clinical nurses.
Ecological-level factors are associated with male nurses' professional status. Future research and practice should recognize the various contexts that may shape the professional identity and career trajectory of men in nursing.
This literature review maps current evidence to inform gender-inclusive educational and organizational strategies that support professional development and workforce retention among men in nursing.
This review identifies gaps in the evidence on career development and gender in relation to male nursing across contexts.
PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews.
None.

PMID:
42885102
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement