Microplastic contamination in the Karnaphuli River, Bangladesh: a PRISMA-guided critical appraisal of evidence reliability, source-attribution uncertainty, and receptor pathways.

Authors

Masuma Wahab, Abdul Hasib Mollah

Published in

Environmental science and pollution research international. Oct 16, 2026. Epub Oct 16, 2026.

Abstract

Microplastic (MP) contamination in tropical river systems is increasingly reported, yet the reliability and comparability of available evidence remain uncertain. This review critically appraises MP contamination in the Karnaphuli River system, Bangladesh, using a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review and an expanded Source-Pathway-Receptor framework. Fifteen peer-reviewed studies were synthesized to evaluate environmental occurrence, methodological quality, reporting comparability, source-attribution certainty, physicochemical characteristics, ecological receptors, and human exposure plausibility. Because studies differed in sampling design, particle-size thresholds, analytical methods, QA/QC reporting, and measurement units, statistical meta-analysis was not appropriate. Available evidence reports MPs in water, sediment, fish, and fishery products, with fibres, fragments, and films frequently dominant. Industrial effluents, municipal wastewater, textile discharge, urban runoff, port activities, and unmanaged plastic waste are plausible contributors, but source attribution remains mainly inferential. Fish-ingestion evidence supports biological uptake and possible trophic transfer, although Karnaphuli-specific freshwater fish data remain limited. Aquatic plants, biofilms, plankton, and benthic organisms are important but understudied receptors. Human dietary exposure through fish and dried fish is plausible but locally unquantified. Overall, the Karnaphuli River should be treated as a high-concern MP system requiring standardized monitoring, source-specific sampling, polymer confirmation, QA/QC transparency, and receptor-based studies.

PMID:
42886420
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.