Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A cross-sectional analysis and forward projection of China's gallbladder and biliary-tract cancer burden: Insights from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study.

Created on 17 Oct 2026

Authors

Ke Yan, Cheng Li, Jia Ma, Yujie Liu, Youfu Tian, Jianfei Zhang

Published in

Medicine. Volume 105. Issue 42. Pages e51008. Oct 16, 2026.

Abstract

Gallbladder and biliary tract cancer (GBTC) remains highly lethal. We examined 32-year epidemiological trends in China and projected outcomes to 2050. Using 2021 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data, we extracted annual GBTC incident and prevalent cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 1990 to 2021, stratified by sex, age, and socio-demographic index (SDI). The age-standardized rates (ASRs) were calculated, and ARIMA models forecast 2050 incidence and mortality. Globally, GBTC risk rises after age 60 and correlates with SDI (R = 0.588). In China, cases increased from 17,077 in 1990 to 51,720 in 2021, raising the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) from 2.04 to 2.49/100,000 (+0.50% annually). Prevalent cases increased to 79,688 (age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) 3.77/100,000). Conversely, ASMR fell from 2.32 to 1.85/100,000 (-0.75%), and DALYs declined from 51.3 to 40.4/100,000 (-0.87%), driven by fewer years of life lost (YLL). Males drove incidence and prevalence. Projections suggest male incidence will keep rising until 2050, while female rates are projected to plateau; male mortality stays stable, and female mortality continues a gradual decline. Aging and rising SDI inflate GBTC incidence, yet improved care compresses mortality. Males carry an increasing share. Targeted prevention and early detection are critical to curb incidence and improve survival.

PMID:
42888557
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement