Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Ocular morphology and morphometry of the great egret (Ardea alba): A comprehensive anatomical description.

Created on 17 Oct 2026

Authors

Julia Vaz Feio, Max Alex Santos Ferreira, Iara Fernanda Lima do Espírito Santo, Elane Guerreiro Giese, Érika Branco, Antônio Basílio Guerreiro Junior, Ana Rita de Lima

Published in

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007). Oct 16, 2026. Epub Oct 16, 2026.

Abstract

Ardea alba (Linnaeus, 1758) is widely distributed, yet knowledge of its ocular morphology remains limited. This study described the morphometry and morphology of the eyeball and its accessory glands in six specimens using radiography, morphometry, light and scanning electron microscopy, and 3D scanning. The eyeballs showed similar descriptive morphometric values in the right and left eyes, accounting for approximately 11.2% of head mass and 12.12% of total skull length. The eye was classified as the flat type, a morphology previously associated in the literature with diurnal birds, featuring a yellow iris and a circular pupil. The scleral ring consists of 14 bilateral type A ossicles associated with hyaline scleral cartilage. Histologically, the cornea showed a well-defined Bowman's membrane, and the retina had 10 distinct layers. The pleated type pecten emerged from the optic nerve and extended toward the vitreous body. The accessory glands were characterized as follows: the Harderian gland (type II) was the most developed; the lacrimal gland was "hockey-stick" shaped; and the nasal gland (salt gland) was supraorbital in location and pyramidal in appearance. These results provide a robust anatomical basis for comparative avian ophthalmology.

PMID:
42888856
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 20
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement